April 19, 2012

Ideographic Nature of the Chinese Writing System

 

The latest article I've uploaded takes issue with Mark Liberman's rejection of the ideographic nature of the Chinese writing system.

Continue reading "Ideographic Nature of the Chinese Writing System" »

April 10, 2012

Ideographic Nature of Pictographs among Chinese Characters

Yesterday I uploaded a second brief article concerning the ideographic nature of Chinese characters that derive from pictographs. The article can be found here or here. If describing pictographs as being ideographic sounds paradoxical, the article will clear things up.

Continue reading "Ideographic Nature of Pictographs among Chinese Characters" »

April 9, 2012

Clarification Regarding the Critique of the Critique

Mair has been generous not only with his time but in other ways I will not detail here as he may not wish to have them specified in public. Additionally, the range and scale of Mair's activities and contributions are scarcely inferior to those of DeFrancis

Continue reading "Clarification Regarding the Critique of the Critique" »

April 6, 2012

Critique of the Ideographic Myth: Conflation of Scholarly Discourse and Social Agenda

As even a slight acquaintance with their activities and writings reveals, DeFrancis and Victor Mair hold illiteracy responsible for tremendous suffering in China, and they have actively promoted script reform as a counter-measure. Both have insisted that the “script reform” at which they aim does not involve abolition, replacement or reduced use of Chinese characters but rather digraphia, the use of the characters and of the romanized script Hanyu pinyin.

Continue reading "Critique of the Ideographic Myth: Conflation of Scholarly Discourse and Social Agenda" »

April 3, 2012

Iconicity of Chinese Characters

Chinese characters are ideographic, but not ideographs.

Continue reading "Iconicity of Chinese Characters" »